Home

 

“Nobody respects us”. – Something I overheard an actor saying this week.

The director-actor relationship is unique. During the course of his work, the actor makes himself incredibly vulnerable, which is to say he loses his self-consciousness (which is a tool for protecting the self) in order to perform in the scene. The director however, remains hidden behind the camera or in the stalls, observing, critiquing. So we see clearly how the actor needs to feel that the director is on his side. We live in an era when the director is regularly credited with good work by the actor (director x drew a great performance from actor y). The director dominates the actor in the sense that the actor is there merely to serve “the director’s vision”, as if the actor possesses no creative individuality of his own. The actor works to please the director. So we can also see how actors are wide open to abuse from directors – the director, angry at his own shortcomings (and that of his “vision”) may take it out on the actor, bullying the actor, or, more slyly, criticise the actor using charm. The director may fail to articulate his ideas properly (either through inability or lack of will) but berate the actor for his lack of understanding. There is the fear of unemployment too, the actor defers to even incompetent directors, while the director may feel he is doing the actor a favour by casting him in an over-crowded market-place. This situation is relatively new however, a hundred years ago, directors had no such power (the job barely existed) and actors headed their own companies, but today, it is easy to see why actors may not feel respected, and begin to not respect themselves as a consequence.

Any actor who believes all directors act in the actor’s best interests, is incredibly naive, and needs to grow-up or they deserve everything they get. Similarly, you are only debasing yourself by repeatedly attempting to win the favour of those who have no respect for you. Self-worth comes from knowing what you are doing, knowing your craft. And once you become confident in your own abilities, you will be more discerning in who you are willing to make an effort for, and there will be no reason to be overly-saddened when treated shabbily; at least you know where you stand, learn from it and move on. Further, once you understand what it is you are actually trying to achieve as an actor, you are better placed to measure whether a certain offer is worth while, or whether a certain situation is worth the effort, worth risking your own good opinion of yourself. If you don’t know what you’re doing, and you don’t know what you want, then you’ll always be somebody else’s play-thing.

8 thoughts on “The Great Acting Blog: “Know What You’re Doing And Know What You Want”

  1. This sounds like it’s written by an actor who had a bad experience w/ a director, which is entirely believable. But i feel the need to add that an actor can be just as abused when a director doesn’t direct AT ALL!
    As a director of many, many community theatre productions, I have learned increasingly that the actor/director are partners, and that if both take that approach good results can happen, and everyone can feel respected and productive.
    I approach a play knowing pretty much what I want, which is honesty and generosity on the part of the actor. I LISTEN to the actor when there is a difference of opinion, but I also expect the actor to listen to me. With that mutual respect, both parties should end up happy with what they achieve.
    It has been my experience on occasion that an actor may not WANT to be directed and there is too much push back. This never results in a good performance.
    TRUST is ALL – and it takes a lot of ego smashing on the part of both!

    • Wow, I totally agree with this. 🙂
      I am an actor and feel that it works best to trust and enjoy the process.
      I refuse to let my bad experiences with directors in the past dominate my approach to current and future ones in a negative way, such that it makes me scared or guarded and not approach the actor/director relationship as a partnership.
      The more I trust myself and my own boundaries and feel worthy, the easier it actually becomes to trust another person.
      I also see my ‘letting go of self-consciousness’ as my strength rather than that my consciousness is my protection, not only in my acting but also in life. Letting go of self-consciousness – the right to be myself – actually helps me to speak up or leave, should i need to.
      Don’t get it twisted – stay strong and keep being you no matter what.

  2. You mis-understand the post …. it’s not about “having a bad experience”, but about knowing your craft, and knowing what you want to achieve, that way the actor can achieve independence creatively, and in their work. Hope that’s cleared that up.

  3. I am an actor, and a director.
    As an actor, I consider my job not only to create a character that the audience will believe, but also to help the director realize his or her vision of the finished work. In villain or comedy roles, I can be “over the top” and I have zero problem with a director telling me “Less!!”
    As a director, I completely understand the psychological vulnerability of actors. My goal is not only to achieve the vision of the project, but to provide a working environment of encouragement, respect, and appreciation. Sometimes, when pressed for other decisions, I might not be giving enough time to the actors, but when that happens, having fostered an atmosphere of mutual trust generally smooths things out.
    When I hear tales of directorial abuse, I usually consider that there’s more to the story (such as, suits slashing the budget during production) — although some people are simply assholes. Most people have had the experience of working for an asshole, whether in this art or a day gig. Time will pass and it will eventually be over, so don’t rise to provocation and do the best that you can. A pro will know that the job is the boss. It’s better to keep one’s reputation intact. As a director, I insist on a good attitude from my collaborators, especially the actors. That often generates the best performances from them. Actors, of course, have every right to expect a good attitude from me. It’s really the only way — especially at the low budget level — to get a great result and the best possible movie.

    • “the job is the boss” – that’s a great way of putting it, Paul. I broadly agree with your points, but I think actors still need to be able to recognise situations where the director isn’t helping. I think this is something which is not discussed enough, taboo even – we want to believe all directors are always looking after the actor’s best interests, but this is simply not true, nor is it realistic. We need to encourage actors to think for themselves, rather than just rely on the director. Many thanks for your comment.

  4. Absolutely, trusting yourself is the flipside to the main thrust of the post. Knowing your stuff not only prevents you from being exploited, but also, as you say, helps you stay open to working with directors, open to that trust which is so important. Many thanks for your insiteful contribution.

  5. Pingback: The Great Acting Blog: “Acting Is A Mysterious Gift” – The Great Acting Blog

  6. Pingback: The Great Acting Blog: “How Do You Measure Improvement?” – The Great Acting Blog

Leave a comment